Atomic Fusion

When it's closed down and the cooling towers are blown up, when it stops producing nuclear waste, I will give this place five stars. As for those who praise the view: I will believe them when they store the nuclear waste in their gardens and stay there radiating for decades in good health.

The food was good. I orderd the cathch of the day. It was glowing yellow but really tasty. The waiter was fast. Maybe thats because he has 3 legs and 4 arms

Nuclear power is the future! Don't mind these people that think a facility harnessing the power of the atom may cause polution simply from the plumes of harmless smoke that billow from it's shaft.

I still wonder how it is possible to give a five stars review for something that destroys the environment and the planet. Well, I know. Egoistic people and short-term selfish egos would for sure always prefer looking at their pockets and interests. Open a school and you'll close such harmful cancerogenic disgusting towers.

Just went past this morning a spectacular sight! 2 of the 4 cooling towers active, blowing harmless water vapour (ie. steam) into the sky. Actually quite fancy a minature version for the house

Good temporary solution for low emissions and lots of output. Still inferior in terms of risk compared to solar power. But you know that takes some time.

Atomkraft? Ya, danke. I give five because it is a remarkable landmark. The four cooling towers look nice on the low hills of the area and the thick white clouds they give off also are nice. Those plants and the science that goes in them are also remarkable. And yes, controlled atom splitting is a very demanding and dangerous buisnes for adults only.

Popular conception is that when something goes wrong in there we have a big mushroom like in Hiroshima. Of course what is more likely to happen is a leakage, not any less dangerous for that. And also the spent fuel is a problem which BTW the French take care of by reprocessing/recycling while in USA is stockpiled in the plant yards. So five stars.

Negative reviews are just about politics. It certainly is the only realistic alternative if wanting zero CO2 emission energy production of significance in France for the next 20 years. So far, zero leaks reported since production started in 1987. Because Japan built a power plant backup generator than cannot survive a Tsunami in a tsunami area and thus cause a melt-down, doesn't mean it will be dangerous in France :

We don't need nuclear power, or as someone here said a "timebomb", but renewable energy. There have been already multiple incidents there, last one in may at reactor 1. They say there was no release of radioactivity but some workers got high levels radiations. If a bigger incident happens in few hours millions of people in north europe would be effected. Is it really worth the risk?

Produces cheap power for the region with no Pollution at all. A really valuable and useful piece of infrastructure. The fluffy white clouds are very beautiful